以上的影片是介紹由波士頓動力學工程公司(Boston Dynamics)專門為美國軍隊研究設計,被命名為“大狗”(Bigdog)的四足機器人運作的情況,相關新聞也可以在「人民網」中找到:
這 段片有不少令人驚訝的地方(雖然那隻"大狗"發出的"躁音"很吵耳),例如當實驗人員大力踢了那個正在夠動中的"大狗"時,"大狗"竟然還可以保持平衡而 不跌在地上,而"大狗"在濕滑的雪地差點滑倒時也能做出適當的反應以防滑到地上,除此以外,"大狗"還能作出跳躍的動作,雖然在跳躍距離及高度上還算不上 甚麼,但已經相當厲害。現在的機械狗看來是為了運送軍用物質而設計,不過我想如果"大狗"的性能再提高,走得更快,能跳得更高更遠,體型再大一些,再配上武器的話,相信就會像Gundam Seed的狗型機械人"巴古"般用作戰鬥了。
原文:http://richardfx.blogspot.com/2008/09/gundam-seed.html
A £1m clock called the "time eater" has been unveiled at Cambridge University by Professor Stephen Hawking.
The author of A Brief History of Time was guest of honour when the unique clock, which has no hands or numbers, was revealed at Corpus Christi College.
Dubbed the strangest clock in the world, it features a giant grasshopper and has 60 slits cut into its face which light up to show the time.
Its creator John Taylor said he "wanted to make timekeeping interesting".
The Corpus Clock will stand outside the college's library and will be on view to the public.
Tribute
Dr Taylor is an inventor and horologist - one who studies the measurement of time - and was a student at Corpus Christi in the 1950s.
He has given the clock as a gift to his former college.
The grasshopper or "chronophage", meaning "time eater", advances around the 4ft-wide face, each step marking a second.
Its movement triggers blue flashing lights which travel across the face eventually stopping at the correct hour and minute.
But the clock is only accurate once every five minutes - the rest of the time the lights are simply for decoration.
Dr Taylor, 72, designed the timepiece as a tribute to English clockmaker John Harrison who solved the problem of longitude in the 18th century.
Harrison also invented the grasshopper escapement - a tiny internal device that releases a clock's gears at each swing of its pendulum.
Dr Taylor told the Daily Mail newspaper he decided "to turn the clock inside out... so you can see the seconds being eaten up".
"Conventional clocks with hands are boring," he said. "I wanted to make timekeeping interesting.
"I also wanted to depict that time is a destroyer - once a minute is gone you can't get it back.
"That's why my grasshopper is not a Disney character. He is a ferocious beast that over the seconds has his tongue lolling out, his jaws opening, then on the 59th second he gulps down time."
Big Ben
Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.
The clock has taken five years and a million pounds to construct
The Corpus Clock is wound up by an electric motor which will last for the next 25 years.
It took a team of eight engineers and craftsman five years to mould the 24-carat gold-plated face.
Alan Midleton, curator of the British Horological Institute, said: "It's a wonderful idea.
"Only time will tell whether it will become as famous as Big Ben - I doubt it, actually."
Dr Taylor made his fortune developing the kettle thermostat.
Story from BBC
NEWS:http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/7625815.stm
Published: 2008/09/19 15:56:05 GMT© BBC MMVIII
By Roger Harrabin
Environment analyst, BBC News
The UK government wants the right to buy its way out of half its CO2 reduction targets, according to a leaked document.
Environmentally it does not matter where emissions reductions take place
Leaked government document
The dispute centres on the credibility of the system used for trading international carbon permits - the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) - arranged under the Kyoto Protocol.
It allows rich countries to offset some of their emissions reductions by purchasing carbon credits which help developing countries get clean technology.
Carbon trading is widely accepted in principle as it does not matter where in the world CO2 is cut because its warming potential is global.
'No saving'
In practice the CDM is under fire because some investors are obtaining credits for clean energy projects in countries like China and India that would have been built anyway, meaning that no CO2 is saved overall.
Various reports suggest that between 20% and 60% of CDM projects do not save additional CO2.
Even so, the leaked document (a so-called "non-paper", discussed between government departments but not yet stated policy) argues: "There are many good reasons why we should support increased access to project (CDM) credits.
"[It will] deliver substantial financial flows to developing countries and will also play a key role in any international deal.
"Environmentally it does not matter where emissions reductions take place.
"[The CDM] provides member states with a cost-effective means to meet their obligations and is an important flexibility mechanism."
It admits: "The commitment from developed countries in making emissions reductions is a critical part of reaching an international deal," and says "the use of flexible mechanisms must be supplemental to domestic action".
But it maintains that a 50% share is consistent with this goal.
Appalling
Dr Keith Allott, head of WWF-UK's climate change programme, said: "This is an appalling proposal from the UK.
"Already the CO2 targets aren't nearly strict enough to avoid the risk of dangerous climate change as defined by scientists. This would weaken the effort even more.
"If governments and companies know they can trade away their responsibilities they will just take their foot off the pedal. We are claiming leadership… this hardly sounds like leadership does it?
"The difference between what the EU are proposing and the UK are proposing is equivalent to 34 extra coal-fired power stations in Europe."
Peter Ainsworth, Conservative environment spokesman said: "Deciding how much CO2 should be traded is not an exact science - it's a matter of judgement.
"But we feel that we should be making around 70% of our emissions cuts on home territory - if it drops to a half then we are rally not sending a signal to the rest of the world that we are taking it seriously."
However Professor Philip Stott, a left-wing climate change sceptic, supported the UK government's stance in principle.
"If we could be sure the CDM was delivering genuine CO2 savings, we should be prepared to offset 100% of our emissions if we are concerned about the poor and climate change," he said.
"There is a need to provide finance to get the best technology to developing countries."
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/7621724.stm
Published: 2008/09/18 01:57:55 GMT
© BBC MMVIII
Also see:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/04/climate_change/html/greenhouse.stm